Election Data Collection Grant Program Report. In December 2. 00. Phoenix Pride Partnership Program Applications for the 2016 Phoenix Pride Festival and Rainbows Festival are now being accepted. Phoenix Pride Partnership General Info. 2008 Volunteer Grant Program - $2,800. Grants & Grant Programs. CLICK HERE for more information about FAITC’s volunteer grant program and for the 2016 Volunteer Grant Application and Guidelines. Read the News Release about the 2008-2009 Teacher Grants. Congress appropriated $1. EAC could establish and fund the Election Data Collection Grant Program contained in the FY 2. Omnibus Appropriations Act (Public Law 1. Title V). Pursuant to the appropriation, the EAC awarded competitive grants of $2 million each to five states: Illinois, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. The pur- pose of the grants was to implement programs to improve the collection of data related to the 2. Federal general election, with a specific emphasis on improving their ability to report election data at the precinct- level. This report is an evaluation of the grant program.
It highlights the extent to which the grantees were able to collect 2. States, and enhance their capacity to collect accurate and complete election data in the future. Report and Data. 20. Election Data Collection Grant Program Evaluation Report. NOTE: Ohio uses the term . Wisconsin's reporting of core data is 1. The grantee average for reporting of core data should be 9. Table 5, page 3. 1). The grantees’ level of compliance with the EAC’s 2. Election Administration and Voting Survey, in terms of percent of core data provided, was higher than non- grantees. All five grantees advanced the efficiency and effectiveness of election data management within their states by way of enhancements to their data collection systems. Innovative training of local election officials on the enhanced systems was essential to the grantees’ program success. Pursuant to the language contained in the Act, the EAC must include in the report that it submits to Congress on the impact of the Election Data Collection Grant Program, . While EAC is not able to provide a final analysis of what it cost the grantee States to undertake precinct- level data collection and reporting, a more detailed analysis will be generated later this year once the grantees’ final financial status reports have been submitted to EAC. However, financial analysis of funds utilized by the five grantees who undertook precinct- level data collection will not necessarily be indicative of costs to other jurisdictions throughout the nation. Many jurisdictions will not have the financial and technical support necessary to conduct statewide precinct- level data collection if Congress makes such a request in the future. Current FEC regulations require data from the States about the National Voter Registration Act be reported to Congress not later than June 3. Federal election year. Currently, data for Congressional mandated reports are col- lected at the State level. States are encouraged to use their statewide databases as tools for generating election data to assist them with responding to EAC’s Election Administration and Voting Survey and other requests for data. This ap- proach could also provide a foundation for the State to easily report data for other areas related to administering elections. Recommendation: States should provide EAC with information on their proven best practice models of election data collection, including precinct- level data, in order to facilitate sharing with all States through EAC’s clearinghouse function. EAC should facilitate ongoing dialogue among the 2. Election Data Collection Grant program grantees and elections officials. Election data collection systems vary widely across the 5. States. Sharing of best practices in data collection and training related to those practices would be very beneficial. Recommendation: For the purpose of compiling comparable precinct- level election data from future EAC Election Administration and Voting surveys the EAC will continue to work to- wards a common understanding of election terms in future EAC Election Administration and Voting Surveys. The EAC will continue to work to address the variations in how election data are reported. There is tremendous variance across the country regarding the policies and procedures that are used to collect and report election data. In the 2. 00. 8 Election Administration and Voting Survey and in its instruction manual EAC offered definitions of various election terms in order to facilitate a common understanding of the data EAC sought.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
January 2017
Categories |